Technical Academy

Academy: AS9102 First Article Inspection

FAI failures are often documentation failures. This page shows how to build an AS9102 FAIR package that survives customer receiving and audits.

Written for U.S./EU engineering, sourcing, and quality teams evaluating CNC machining partners in Vietnam.

SEMIX CNC machining insights
SEMIX — Precision CNC machining in Vietnam for global supply chains.

Executive takeaway

AS9102 First Article Inspection (FAI) is not “extra inspection.” It is a structured evidence package that proves:

  • the manufacturing process can produce the design,
  • the supplier is controlling configuration,
  • and all characteristics are accounted for.

If you cannot build a coherent FAIR package, you will lose time at receiving—even when parts are good.

What AS9102 demands in practice

A credible FAI system includes:

  • drawing ballooning with characteristic IDs
  • traceability to drawing revision and planning documents
  • objective measurement evidence for every characteristic
  • linkage to material and special process certifications where applicable

The most common reasons FAIR packages fail

  • Unballooned or duplicated characteristics
  • Missing revision control (drawing/spec mismatch)
  • Missing evidence for special processes or outside processing
  • Unclear measurement method and datum simulation
  • Incomplete linkage between traveler, inspection, and certs

A production-ready workflow to build FAIR packages

Step 1 — balloon the drawing correctly

  • Unique ID for each characteristic
  • Avoid combining characteristics unless buyer allows

Step 2 — map each balloon to a measurement method

For each characteristic define:

  • tool (CMM, pin, height gage, optical, functional gage)
  • datum simulation and fixturing
  • environmental conditions if critical
  • decision rule policy for borderline values (when required)

Step 3 — build the evidence pack structure

A buyer-friendly FAIR binder typically includes:

  • cover page with part number and revision
  • process plan / traveler
  • inspection results and data files
  • material certs and traceability
  • outside processing certs (anodize, passivation, heat treat, NDT, etc.)
  • calibration traceability where required

Step 4 — define change triggers (delta vs full FAI)

Define what triggers a partial or full FAI:

  • machine or process changes
  • program/post changes
  • tooling/fixture redesign
  • material source changes
  • drawing or spec revision

How to reduce receiving friction

  • Present the FAIR package in a consistent, audit-ready format.
  • Use buyer language: “characteristic accountability,” “revision control,” “traceability,” “special process evidence.”
  • Provide clear contact paths for clarification during receiving.

Buyer evidence pack

  • Standard FAIR template (repeatable)
  • Revision control log and change trigger policy
  • Example FAIR package from a representative program (redacted)

FAQ for buyers

  1. When do we need a full re-FAI vs a delta FAI?
  2. What causes the most common receiving rejections in AS9102 flows?
  3. How can a Vietnam CNC supplier reduce audit friction and delays?

Standards & references

  • SAE AS9102 — Aerospace First Article Inspection Requirement

Related SEMIX resources

Need a quote or a manufacturability review?

Send drawings and requirements. We can propose process options, inspection plans, lead time, and a documentation package aligned to your industry needs.

Request a Quote (RFQ) Contact